on the hover and

agree that there ant no revolut onon the Poet csl st. thatl st smorel kea cockta lparty atwh chpontlessf stcuffs prov dethe onlyexc tement. but what revolut ons there, now? def net. some poetry revolut onares that come tom ndfor me: Pound, Olson, StenD cknson, Wh tman. fa revolut onex sts now, what monolth sbe ngtaken on, and whon deed are the revolutonar es. geet's really a rather corny concept, more a generat onal ntake of breath than a battle. the namesc ted prov dedash ft, at least asseet, and've learned from them. lots ofwr tersnterest and excte mebut wouldn't tag them revolut onares. Proust, fornstances sosu geners, that wouldn't th nkanyone could chooseh mas a revolut onary leader. tho canth nkof 3 books that have been compared to Remembrance: by Anthony Powell, Robert Mus land Truman Capote. Powell's 12-ology sonly superf cally like Remembrance, a very long f ctonal zed memoir. haven't read Mus lyet. Capote salarf. I mean om gawd, he's just lostn that Hollywood artst crap (craph ghly recommend read ng, for laugh ng purposes). anyway, howabout arevolut onn wh ch poets get pad. or not. who cares, really.